Category: Uncategorised

“A powered respirator can appear operational while damaged seals, blocked filters, deteriorating batteries or insufficient airflow reduce the protection it provides.”

JSP PowerCap systems combine powered respiratory protection with an integrated headtop, but they still need to be checked, maintained and tested properly.

Employers using PowerCap Active, PowerCap Active IP or PowerCap Infinity equipment should have arrangements for pre-use checks, scheduled examinations, maintenance, fault reporting and replacement of worn components.

Velocity Safety provides documented JSP PowerCap inspections, helping employers assess equipment condition, identify defects and maintain traceable records under COSHH Regulation 9.

Learn more about our documented RPE Inspection service.

Jump to:

What Is a JSP PowerCap?

JSP PowerCap products are powered air-purifying respirators, commonly abbreviated to PAPR.

A battery-powered fan draws contaminated workplace air through particulate filters before supplying filtered air to the wearer’s breathing zone.

Unlike a conventional disposable or reusable tight-fitting mask, the complete PowerCap system includes several components that work together:

• Powered fan or turbo unit
• Particulate filters and pre-filters
• Battery and charging equipment
• Visor and face seal
• Headtop or helmet assembly
• Internal airflow pathways
• Warning indicators or alarms, depending on the model

The equipment can only provide its intended protection when the complete system is correctly assembled, suitable for the task and operating within the manufacturer’s requirements.

A new filter alone does not make a damaged or poorly maintained PowerCap safe.

JSP PowerCap Active vs PowerCap Infinity

PowerCap Active and PowerCap Infinity are both powered respirators, but their protection ratings, head protection and intended applications differ significantly.

The higher rating of PowerCap Infinity does not automatically make it suitable for every hazardous substance or working environment.

RPE selection must still consider:

• The hazardous substance present
• Its concentration and workplace exposure limit
• The required protection factor
• Whether the contaminant is a particle, gas, vapour or combination
• The duration and physical demands of the task
• Other required head, eye, face or hearing protection
• The equipment manufacturer’s limitations

Powered particulate-filtering equipment must not be treated as protection against gases, vapours, oxygen-deficient atmospheres or other hazards outside its approved capability.

Why JSP PowerCap Inspections Matter

A powered respirator contains more potential failure points than a simple disposable mask.

A unit might start and sound normal while still having:

• Restricted airflow caused by loaded filters
• A weakened battery that cannot support the full working period
• Damage to the visor seal
• Missing or incorrectly installed pre-filters
• Cracked housings or filter covers
• Contaminated airflow pathways
• Damaged electrical connections
• Worn head harness components
• Incorrectly fitted replacement parts

Under COSHH Regulation 9, control measures must be maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order, in good repair and in a clean condition.

Where RPE is used as part of the employer’s exposure-control arrangements, it should be supported by a properly managed programme covering selection, use, checks, maintenance, storage, training and record keeping.

An inspection helps establish the recorded condition of the equipment at that point in time. It does not remove the wearer’s responsibility to complete the required checks before every use.

What Is Checked During a JSP PowerCap Inspection?

The exact inspection depends on the model, its configuration, condition and manufacturer instructions.

A documented PowerCap inspection may include:

Equipment Identification

The manufacturer, model, serial number or unique asset ID is recorded so that inspection findings can be linked to the correct unit.

General Condition

The complete unit is checked for impact damage, cracks, distortion, excessive contamination, missing parts, unauthorised modifications and signs of unsuitable storage.

Filters and Pre-Filters

Checks can include filter type, compatibility, installation, contamination, visible damage and whether both sides of a twin-filter system have been changed correctly.

Filters should never be cleaned using compressed air or reused contrary to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Fan and Airflow Performance

The unit is switched on and checked using the applicable JSP airflow indicator or test method. A low-flow result must be investigated rather than ignored.

Battery and Charging Equipment

The battery, connection points, charger and charging dock where applicable are examined for damage, contamination, deterioration and obvious charging faults.

Visor and Face Seal

The visor is checked for damage, deep scratches, contamination and loss of visibility. The face seal is examined for tears, poor attachment, distortion and excessive wear.

Headtop, Harness and Adjustment

The cap, helmet shell, suspension harness, adjustment mechanism and retaining components are checked for damage and correct assembly.

Warnings and Indicators

Where fitted, visual and audible warnings are checked as part of the applicable functional inspection procedure.

Inspection Outcome

The unit receives a documented outcome, with defects and recommended actions recorded. Equipment that cannot provide its intended protection should not be returned to use until the problem has been resolved.

PowerCap Active Inspection and Maintenance

JSP describes PowerCap Active as a TH1P powered respirator with a UK APF of 10. It uses HardCap A1+ bump-cap technology and is intended for appropriate particulate applications where that protection level is adequate.

JSP identifies applications including light machining and milling, agriculture, landscaping and food processing. Its suitability must still be confirmed through the employer’s COSHH assessment.

Important PowerCap Active checks include:

• Airflow check using the supplied indicator
• Condition and cleanliness of both filters
• Correct installation of pre-filter pads and covers
• Fan and motor operation
• Battery charge and connection condition
• Visor clarity and attachment
• Condition and attachment of the face seal
• Condition of the cap and bump-cap insert
• Signs of contamination inside the equipment

JSP warns that regular filter maintenance, replacement and cleaning are important to reduce the possibility of premature fan or motor failure.

It is also important to distinguish between PowerCap Active variants.

The standard PowerCap Active visor should not automatically be treated as impact-rated eye protection. Where impact protection is required, the exact PowerCap model and its certification must be checked rather than assumed from the product name.

PowerCap Infinity Inspection and Maintenance

PowerCap Infinity is a TH3P powered respirator with a UK APF of 40. It combines respiratory protection with an EN 397 industrial safety helmet and an EN 166.1.B impact visor.

The system incorporates twin filters, a powered turbo unit, a rechargeable battery and real-time monitoring of filter and battery condition.

Important PowerCap Infinity checks include:

• Pre-use airflow indication
• Condition and correct fitting of both filters and pre-filters
• Turbo-drive operation
• Battery condition and charge status
• Operation of visual and audible warnings
• Visor condition and visibility
• Visor-seal integrity
• Helmet shell and suspension condition
• Adjustment and retention components
• Condition of any compatible hearing protection
• Contamination or obstruction of airflow routes

JSP has designed PowerCap Infinity as a modular system, with components including filters, filter covers, visor, helmet, harness strap, turbo-drive unit, battery pack, visor seal and charging dock available as replaceable elements.

Replaceable does not mean every damaged unit should automatically be dismantled by an untrained person. Repairs and component replacement must follow the applicable instructions and competence requirements.

How Often Should JSP PowerCap Equipment Be Inspected?

There is no single interval that should be applied without considering how the equipment is used.

A complete RPE programme can involve several layers of checking:

Equipment used heavily or in particularly dusty, abrasive or contaminating conditions may need attention more frequently than equipment used occasionally and stored correctly.

The inspection arrangement should be documented within the employer’s RPE programme.

Common JSP PowerCap Faults and Warning Signs

PowerCap units should be removed from use and investigated where there are signs that protection may have been compromised.

Common concerns include:

• Airflow indicator failing to reach the required position
• Low-flow, filter or battery warnings
• Fans sounding irregular or failing to start correctly
• Battery not holding sufficient charge
• Cracked filter covers or housings
• Damaged, heavily loaded or incorrectly fitted filters
• Only one filter being replaced on a twin-filter unit
• Torn, detached or heavily contaminated face seals
• Scratched or damaged visors affecting visibility
• Damaged helmet shells, bump-cap inserts or harness components
• Blocked or contaminated airflow paths
• Missing parts or incompatible replacement components
• Evidence that the unit has been incorrectly cleaned or immersed

Passing a quick switch-on test is not sufficient where other defects remain.

Is a PowerCap Inspection the Same as Servicing?

No. Inspection and servicing are related, but they are not the same activity.

An inspection may conclude that a PowerCap can remain in use, needs a consumable component changing, requires more extensive servicing or should be removed from service.

JSP PowerCap Support From Velocity Safety

Velocity Safety currently provides documented inspections for JSP PowerCap Active, PowerCap Active IP and PowerCap Infinity equipment.

Our inspection support can include:

• Equipment identification and asset logging
• Condition and component checks
• Filter and pre-filter assessment
• Battery and charging-equipment checks
• Visor, face seal and headtop inspection
• Airflow testing where applicable
• Clear pass, fail or further-action outcomes
• Defect reporting and next-due dates
• Digital records for individual units or complete fleets

We can support individual PowerCap users, workshops, manufacturing sites and organisations managing powered RPE across multiple departments or locations.

For wider maintenance and performance-testing requirements, see our RPE Examination and Servicing service.

How to Prepare PowerCap Units for Inspection

Providing a few details before booking helps us confirm the appropriate inspection route and produce an accurate quotation.

Where possible, send:

• The PowerCap model and variant
• Number of units
• Serial or asset numbers where available
• Approximate age and usage pattern
• Details of any warning lights, alarms or airflow problems
• Photographs of visible damage
• Previous inspection or maintenance records
• Your preferred site or workshop arrangement

Equipment should be supplied in a suitably clean and decontaminated condition. Tell us in advance if it has been exposed to hazardous dust, chemicals or biological contaminants.

Arrange a JSP PowerCap Inspection or Service

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Velocity Safety inspect JSP PowerCap equipment?

Yes. Velocity Safety provides documented inspections for JSP PowerCap Active, Active IP and PowerCap Infinity equipment. We can check equipment condition, components and airflow where applicable, then provide a recorded outcome and details of any defects requiring action.

Does Velocity Safety provide JSP PowerCap servicing?

Yes. Velocity Safety provides inspections and servicing for applicable JSP PowerCap Active, PowerCap Active IP and PowerCap Infinity equipment. The precise service scope depends on the model, equipment condition, identified faults and availability of suitable replacement components.

What is the difference between PowerCap Active and PowerCap Infinity?

PowerCap Active is a TH1P powered respirator with a UK APF of 10 and EN 812 bump-cap protection. PowerCap Infinity is a TH3P system with a UK APF of 40, an EN 397 industrial safety helmet and an EN 166.1.B impact visor. The correct model depends on the hazards, task and protection level identified by the risk assessment.

Does a JSP PowerCap require face fit testing?

JSP states that PowerCap Active and PowerCap Infinity do not require face fit testing. However, the equipment must still be suitable for the wearer, task, contaminant and required protection factor. Face fit testing remains necessary for separate tight-fitting RPE used by the employee.

Should airflow be checked before using a PowerCap?

Yes. JSP’s instructions require the airflow to be checked before use using the applicable airflow indicator. If the indicator does not show adequate airflow, the equipment should not be used until the cause has been identified and resolved.

How often should PowerCap filters be replaced?

Filter life depends on the model, contamination level, usage and manufacturer instructions. Filters should be replaced when required by the instructions, when damaged, when loading affects airflow or when the equipment indicates that replacement is necessary. Both filters on a twin-filter system should be changed together.

Can PowerCap filters be cleaned with compressed air?

No. JSP specifically warns against using compressed air on PowerCap Infinity filters. Blowing contamination from a filter does not safely restore its performance and can damage the filter media.

What happens if a PowerCap fails inspection?

The defect is documented and the unit should be removed from use where it cannot provide its intended protection. Depending on the issue, it may require cleaning, replacement consumables, approved component replacement, servicing or complete replacement.

Can several PowerCap units be inspected on site?

Yes. Velocity Safety can support bulk and multi-site inspection programmes, including equipment identification, documented outcomes, defect reporting and next-due dates.

Can multiple PowerCap units be inspected and serviced?

Yes. Velocity Safety can support individual units, bulk equipment inspections and multi-site servicing programmes. Send us the models, quantities and current service dates, and we’ll provide the appropriate quotation and servicing plan.

Resources

• HSE – Respiratory Protective Equipment at Work (HSG53)
• HSE – RPE Advice for Employers
• Velocity Safety – RPE Inspections
• Velocity Safety – RPE Examination and Servicing

“Velocity Safety is now the sole UK service agent for applicable Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus fall arrest blocks – providing a direct, manufacturer-authorised route for inspection, servicing, repair and recertification.”

Velocity Safety has been appointed as the sole UK service agent for applicable Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus fall arrest blocks.

The appointments expand our manufacturer-authorised fall protection capabilities and give equipment owners, contractors, hire companies and safety teams a direct UK route for annual servicing, model-specific repairs and recertification.

Our engineers can support applicable cable and webbing fall arrest blocks, inertia reels and self-retracting lifelines used across construction, facilities management, manufacturing, utilities, confined spaces and other work-at-height environments.

Explore our Fall Arrest Block & Inertia Reel Inspection and Servicing service.

Jump to:

What Has Velocity Safety Been Approved to Service?

Velocity Safety has been appointed as the sole UK service agent for applicable fall arrest blocks manufactured or supplied under three recognised fall-protection brands:

• Aresta fall arrest blocks and retractable lifelines
• JSP fall arrest blocks and self-retracting lifelines
• Delta Plus fall arrest blocks and retractable fall arresters

This status applies to the relevant equipment and service procedures covered by each manufacturer’s approval.

Because the construction and servicing requirements differ between models, we confirm the exact make, model, serial number and service requirement before accepting equipment.

Applicable work may include:

• External condition and functional inspection
• Authorised strip-down and internal examination
• Cleaning of accessible and serviceable components
• Inspection of braking, locking and retraction mechanisms
• Inspection of webbing, wire rope or cable
• Replacement of approved serviceable parts
• Reassembly and manufacturer-specified functional testing
• Equipment identification and service tagging
• Digital servicing and inspection documentation
• Confirmation of the applicable next-due date

The exact scope depends on the model, its condition, its history and the manufacturer procedure.

What Does “Sole UK Service Agent” Mean?

Being appointed the sole UK service agent means Velocity Safety provides the manufacturer-authorised servicing route in the UK for the applicable Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus fall arrest block ranges.

This is particularly important where work involves opening the casing, inspecting internal braking or retraction mechanisms, replacing model-specific components or completing a manufacturer-defined service procedure.

A fall arrest block is not simply a cable or length of webbing inside a plastic or metal casing.

Depending on the model, it can contain:

• Internal pawls and locking mechanisms
• Brake assemblies and friction components
• Retraction springs
• Drums, bearings and guides
• Wire-rope or webbing assemblies
• Energy-absorbing components
• Load or fall indicators
• Swivels, hooks and connectors
• Retrieval or rescue mechanisms

Servicing these components requires the correct instructions, competence, replacement parts, tools and test procedures for the particular equipment.

Aresta Fall Arrest Block Servicing in the UK

Aresta supplies a range of retractable fall protection equipment, including compact webbing fall arrest blocks and longer cable-based retractable lifelines.

Its range includes:

• Compact single webbing fall arrest blocks
• Twin retractable webbing fall arrest blocks
• Retractable lifelines fitted with scaffold hooks
• Longer cable-based retractable lifelines
• Equipment designed for different attachment arrangements and working environments

Velocity Safety’s appointment as the sole UK service agent provides Aresta equipment owners with a direct route for applicable annual servicing, repairs and recertification.

Before work begins, we confirm:

• The Aresta model and product reference
• Serial number and equipment identification
• Webbing or cable length
• Previous inspection or service history
• Any known fall, overload or damage event
• Whether workshop servicing or an on-site visit is appropriate

Aresta produces retractable lifelines in several configurations, so customers should not assume that every model has an identical servicing procedure.

If you manage Aresta blocks, send us the product details or photographs and we will confirm the appropriate service route.

JSP Fall Arrest Block & SRL Servicing

JSP supplies self-retracting lifelines and fall arrest blocks across compact webbing, wire-rope and rescue configurations.

Examples include:

• Compact webbing fall limiters
• Wire self-retracting lifelines
• Sharp-edge and horizontal-use models
• Longer cable-based fall arrest blocks
• Retrieval fall arrest blocks incorporating a rescue winch

Velocity Safety is now the sole UK service agent for applicable JSP fall arrest blocks and SRLs.

Depending on the model, inspection and servicing may consider:

• Casing and structural condition
• Webbing or wire-rope condition
• Retraction throughout the working length
• Locking response
• Fall or load indicators
• Swivel hooks and connectors
• Internal serviceable components
• Rescue or retrieval functions where fitted

The precise checks and repairs are determined by the applicable JSP procedure rather than a generic SRL checklist.

This fall-protection appointment is separate from JSP PowerCap respiratory equipment. Velocity Safety provides documented JSP PowerCap inspections, manufacturer-authorised servicing and repairs for applicable PowerCap Active, PowerCap Active IP and PowerCap Infinity systems.

Delta Plus Fall Arrest Block Servicing in the UK

Delta Plus manufactures a broad range of retractable fall arresters for work-at-height applications.

The range includes:

• Compact webbing fall arresters
• Cable-based retractable fall arresters
• Models intended for different lifeline lengths
• Equipment designed for vertical or applicable horizontal use
• Retractable equipment incorporating additional rescue or winch functions

Velocity Safety’s appointment as the sole UK service agent gives Delta Plus fall arrest block users access to an authorised UK servicing route for applicable models.

Delta Plus product families include compact and longer-distance retractable devices, but model names and product references can change over time. That makes accurate equipment identification important.

When requesting a quote, provide:

• The product name or reference
• Serial number
• Lifeline material and length
• Photographs of the unit and label
• Current inspection or service date
• Details of any defect, fall or impact event

We will confirm whether the model falls within our authorised scope and what work is required before booking.

Inspection, Thorough Examination and Servicing Are Not the Same

The terms inspection, thorough examination and servicing are often used interchangeably, but they do not necessarily describe the same work.

Not every fall arrest block is subject to precisely the same combination of requirements.

The correct approach depends on:

• The manufacturer instructions
• The make and model
• How the equipment is being used
• The applicable legislation
• Previous inspection and service findings
• Whether the equipment has arrested a fall
• The conditions in which it is used and stored

Velocity Safety documents the activity being provided so that inspection, thorough examination and servicing are not incorrectly presented as the same check.

For more detail, see our guide to the difference between fall arrest blocks, inertia reels and retrieval devices.

Do Fall Arrest Blocks Need Servicing Every 12 Months?

Fall arrest blocks commonly require manufacturer inspection, servicing and recertification at intervals specified by the manufacturer.

The Work at Height Safety Association’s guidance on retractable fall arresters states that fall arrest blocks should be serviced, inspected and recertified by the manufacturer or an approved service company at least every 12 months, or sooner where necessary.

However, “annual” should not be treated as permission to ignore the equipment for the remaining 364 days.

Fall arrest blocks should also receive:

• A check by the user before use
• Recorded detailed inspections at the appropriate interval
• Additional examination following damage or suspected loss of performance
• Immediate removal from use after arresting a fall
• More frequent attention where the equipment is exposed to arduous conditions

Factors that may justify earlier inspection or servicing include:

• Frequent or intensive use
• Exposure to water, dirt, concrete dust or grit
• Contact with paint, oils, chemicals or solvents
• Outdoor storage or prolonged exposure to weather
• Corrosion
• Damage to the casing, webbing, cable or connectors
• Poor or inconsistent retraction
• Activation of a fall indicator
• Unknown service history

The appropriate schedule should follow the manufacturer’s instructions and reflect how the equipment is actually used.

Why Manufacturer-Authorised Servicing Matters

Fall arrest blocks are safety-critical mechanical devices that may remain unused for long periods before being expected to operate immediately during a fall.

Some faults are visible externally. Others affect internal components hidden inside the casing.

Potential problems can include:

• Worn or damaged pawls
• Degraded brake components
• Corrosion inside the housing
• Damaged or weakened retraction springs
• Contaminated internal mechanisms
• Frayed webbing or broken cable strands
• Damaged lifeline guides
• Activated fall indicators
• Worn swivels, hooks or connectors
• Missing, incompatible or unauthorised replacement parts

Manufacturer-authorised servicing ensures applicable internal work is completed using the relevant procedure, approved components and required functional tests for that model.

It also provides a clearer service history for safety teams, auditors, equipment owners and hire companies managing larger fleets.

How Velocity Safety’s Fall Arrest Block Servicing Works

Our process begins with accurate equipment identification.

1. Send Us the Equipment Details

Provide the manufacturer, model, quantity, lifeline length and site location.

Photographs of the product label and complete unit are helpful where the model is uncertain.

2. We Confirm the Required Service

We determine whether the equipment falls within our authorised service scope and whether it requires inspection, servicing, repair, thorough examination or a combination of activities.

You receive a clear quotation before work begins.

3. On-Site or Workshop Arrangement

Depending on the equipment and work required, we can arrange:

• On-site inspection or servicing
• Delivery to our Blackburn workshop
• Courier collection and return
• Coordinated servicing for multiple units

Some internal repairs and manufacturer-specific procedures may need to be completed under controlled workshop conditions.

4. Inspection and Authorised Servicing

The unit is inspected and serviced according to the relevant scope and manufacturer procedure.

Any defects or additional parts required are identified before chargeable remedial work proceeds.

5. Testing and Documentation

Following applicable servicing and reassembly, the equipment receives the manufacturer-specified functional checks or tests.

The documentation identifies:

• The equipment serviced
• Manufacturer, model and serial number
• Work completed
• Defects found
• Components replaced where applicable
• Service or inspection outcome
• Applicable next-due date

Where a separate LOLER thorough examination is required and included, it is documented separately rather than being treated as identical to manufacturer servicing.

Who Will Benefit From the New UK Servicing Route?

The appointments will support organisations using fall arrest blocks across a wide range of industries.

These include:

• Construction and civil engineering contractors
• Scaffolding and access companies
• Utilities and infrastructure providers
• Facilities and building-maintenance teams
• Warehousing and distribution operations
• Manufacturing and engineering sites
• Confined-space and rescue teams
• Telecommunications contractors
• Work-at-height training providers
• PPE hire companies and equipment distributors
• Multi-site health and safety teams

For equipment owners, the new arrangements provide a clear route for servicing applicable Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus equipment without needing to identify an overseas provider or use a company without the applicable manufacturer approval.

Our Wider Manufacturer-Approved Servicing Capability

The Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus appointments build upon Velocity Safety’s existing fall-protection servicing capabilities.

Velocity Safety is also an approved service and repair agent for:

• Abtech Safety
• Ridgegear
• Globestock Safety

Inspection and servicing support is also available for equipment from other manufacturers, subject to the model, required work, manufacturer instructions and availability of approved replacement components.

Velocity Safety is also an authorised G-Force service agent, providing manufacturer-authorised servicing and repairs for applicable G-Force fall arrest blocks. Read our G-Force service-agent announcement or send us your equipment details to confirm the available service.

If you are unsure whether a particular fall arrest block can be serviced, send us the make, model and a photograph. We will confirm the available route before asking you to send the equipment.

Arrange Aresta, JSP, Delta Plus or G-Force Fall Arrest Block Servicing

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fall arrest block manufacturers is Velocity Safety the sole UK service agent for?

Velocity Safety is the sole UK service agent for applicable Aresta, JSP and Delta Plus fall arrest blocks. The precise service availability depends on the model, condition and manufacturer procedure.

Can Velocity Safety complete annual servicing for Aresta fall arrest blocks?

Yes. Velocity Safety provides the manufacturer-authorised UK servicing route for applicable Aresta fall arrest blocks and retractable lifelines. Send us the model, serial number and lifeline length so we can confirm the required work.

Can Velocity Safety service JSP self-retracting lifelines?

Yes, for applicable models. Our JSP fall protection capability includes relevant fall arrest blocks and self-retracting lifelines. Serviceability and scope are confirmed from the exact product reference.

Can Velocity Safety service Delta Plus fall arrest blocks?

Yes. Velocity Safety is the sole UK service agent for applicable Delta Plus fall arrest blocks. Delta Plus supplies several webbing and cable retractable ranges, so the model should be confirmed before booking.

Does every fall arrest block require annual servicing?

Many manufacturers and industry guidance specify servicing, inspection and recertification at least every 12 months, or sooner where necessary. The applicable interval should always be confirmed from the instructions for the particular model and adjusted where use, damage, contamination or environmental conditions create additional risk.

Is an annual inspection the same as manufacturer servicing?

Not necessarily. An inspection records the current condition and operation of the equipment. Manufacturer servicing may involve authorised strip-down, internal examination, cleaning, component replacement, reassembly and model-specific testing. A LOLER thorough examination is another distinct activity where LOLER applies.

What happens if a fall arrest block has arrested a fall?

It should be removed from service immediately, clearly identified and assessed through the appropriate route. It should not be returned to use simply because it appears undamaged externally.

Can fall arrest blocks be serviced on site?

Some inspection and servicing activities can be completed on site. Other internal repairs or manufacturer-specific procedures may require workshop conditions. We will confirm the appropriate option after identifying the equipment and work required.

Can I send fall arrest blocks to your workshop?

Yes. Equipment can be delivered to our Blackburn workshop, and courier collection and return can also be arranged. Include the equipment details and contact information securely with the shipment.

Do you provide documentation after servicing?

Yes. The documentation identifies the equipment, work completed, findings, outcome and applicable next-due date. Where manufacturer servicing and a separate thorough examination are both required and booked, the activities are clearly distinguished.

Can you service fall arrest blocks from other manufacturers?

Velocity Safety is also an approved service and repair agent for Abtech Safety, Ridgegear and Globestock Safety. Support for other manufacturers depends on the model, required work, manufacturer requirements and availability of approved parts.

Can Velocity Safety service G-Force fall arrest blocks?

Yes. Velocity Safety is an authorised G-Force service agent, providing manufacturer-authorised servicing and repairs for applicable G-Force fall arrest blocks.

Send us the model, serial number, quantity and photographs of your equipment and we’ll confirm the available service, expected turnaround and collection or on-site options.

Resources

• HSE – Working at Height: A Brief Guide
• HSE – Inspecting Fall Arrest Equipment Made From Webbing or Rope
• WAHSA – Selection, Use, Maintenance and Inspection of Retractable Fall Arresters
• Aresta – Retractable Lifeline Products
• JSP – Fall Limiters and Self-Retracting Lifelines
• Delta Plus – Retractable Fall Arresters
• Velocity Safety – Fall Arrest Block & Inertia Reel Servicing
• Velocity Safety – PFPE Inspections & Equipment Checks
• Fall Arrest Block vs Inertia Reel: What Is the Difference?

“A PSSR examination is not a generic pressure vessel checklist. The Written Scheme of Examination determines what must be examined, how and when.”

What actually happens when a pressure vessel is due for its PSSR examination? Does the engineer inspect the inside, test the safety valve or carry out ultrasonic testing?

The answer depends on the pressure system and its Written Scheme of Examination (WSE). The scheme identifies the parts that need examination, the method and frequency of examination, and any preparation needed to carry it out safely.

A competent person then examines the specified parts in accordance with that scheme and produces a written report. This guide explains what that process can include, what you may need to do before the visit and what happens if the examination identifies a defect.

Explore Velocity Safety’s PSSR examinations and Written Schemes service.

Jump to:

What Is a PSSR Examination?

A PSSR examination is the formal examination of specified parts of a pressure system under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000.

People often call it a PSSR inspection or pressure vessel inspection. The Regulations use the term examination.

Its purpose is to identify defects or deterioration in the parts covered by the Written Scheme before failure could cause danger from stored pressure. PSSR can apply to systems containing relevant fluids such as steam, compressed air or other qualifying gases, subject to the Regulations’ definitions and exceptions.

A pressure system can include a rigid pressure vessel, associated pipework and protective devices. That is why examining only the outside of a receiver may not satisfy a scheme that also specifies a safety valve or other components.

If you first need to establish whether your system requires a scheme, read our PSSR Written Scheme of Examination Requirements guide.

How Does the Written Scheme Control the Examination?

The Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) is the starting point. It must be drawn up or certified as suitable by a competent person and be in place before a qualifying system is operated.

A suitable scheme identifies:

• The pressure system and the parts requiring examination
• The nature of each examination and any necessary testing
• How protective devices will be examined or tested
• Any special measures needed to prepare the system safely
• The maximum intervals between examinations
• Any examination required before first use, where appropriate
• Critical parts needing examination after certain repairs or modifications

The scope should reflect the actual system. Two air receivers may look alike but have different operating conditions, histories or likely deterioration mechanisms. Their examinations need not be identical.

The competent person should also review whether the WSE remains suitable. If a system has been modified or its condition has changed, the scheme may need updating rather than simply repeating last year’s procedure.

What Happens Before the Examination?

Before starting physical checks, the competent person establishes what the scheme requires and whether the system presented matches the documentation.

They may review:

• The current WSE and previous examination report
• Equipment identity and manufacturer information
• Safe operating limits
• Maintenance, repair and modification history
• Previous defects or recommendations
• The examination methods specified by the WSE
• Access, isolation and other preparation requirements

The user of an installed system, or owner of a mobile system, must take appropriate safety measures to prepare it for examination. If the WSE requires a shutdown or internal access, this should be planned before the competent person arrives.

What Is Checked on a Pressure Vessel?

Where the vessel is included in the scheme, the competent person examines it for defects or deterioration relevant to its safe operation. The exact checks depend on the vessel and the method specified by the WSE.

Depending on access and examination scope, findings may include:

• External or internal corrosion
• Material thinning or erosion
• Cracking, distortion or bulging
• Leakage
• Damage near welds, openings or connections
• Deterioration at nozzles or supports
• Evidence of damage from operating conditions

An internal examination is not automatically part of every visit. Where it is required, the vessel must be safely prepared and made accessible. The competent person then records what was examined, any limitations and the results.

For more detail on a common workplace pressure vessel, see our Air Receiver PSSR Compliance Guide.

Are Safety Valves and Protective Devices Examined?

Yes, where they form part of the pressure system, protective devices must be addressed by the WSE. They help prevent the system operating outside its safe limits.

Depending on the installation, these may include safety valves, pressure relief valves, bursting discs and other pressure-limiting devices. The scheme should specify the examination or testing needed to establish that they remain effective.

That does not mean every device undergoes the same test on every visit. The method must be suitable for the device and the particular system.

This part of the examination matters because a vessel can appear sound while a defective or incorrectly set protective device leaves it vulnerable to overpressure.

Does the Examination Include Pipework, Gauges and Fittings?

It can, where the WSE includes them. The scheme should cover relevant pipework or pipelines whose failure could give rise to danger. It should also identify other parts that need examination for the system to remain safe.

Depending on the arrangement, the competent person may need to examine specified:

• Pressure pipework and connections
• Valves, flanges or fittings
• Protective devices connected to the pipework
• Pressure indication or control equipment relevant to safe operation

This does not mean every metre of pipework automatically receives the same examination as a pressure vessel. The WSE identifies the safety-critical parts and the appropriate method for each.

Does Every PSSR Examination Include NDT or Internal Inspection?

No. Non-destructive testing (NDT) and internal examination are used where the WSE and the expected deterioration mechanisms call for them. They are not universal additions to every PSSR visit.

Depending on what needs to be detected, suitable NDT may include ultrasonic thickness measurement, ultrasonic flaw detection, magnetic particle testing or dye penetrant testing.

The method needs to answer a specific question. For example, a thickness measurement may help assess material loss, while another technique may be needed to investigate a suspected crack. Simply carrying out “some NDT” does not prove that the relevant risk has been assessed.

HSE’s technical guidance on inspection and NDT explains that the WSE should identify the expected damage mechanism, examination interval and examination method, including required NDT.

Does the System Need to Be Shut Down?

That depends on the examination specified by the WSE. Some checks may be possible while the system is in an appropriate operating condition. Others require it to be taken out of service.

Preparation could involve shutting down, isolating, depressurising, draining or cooling equipment, or opening a vessel for internal examination. Safe access may also need to be arranged.

The dutyholder should agree these requirements before the visit. An engineer cannot complete an internal examination if the vessel remains pressurised and inaccessible when they arrive.

What Does the PSSR Examination Report Include?

After the examination, the competent person must produce a written report. It is more than a sticker or a simple pass/fail certificate.

Under PSSR Regulation 9, the report must state:

• Which parts of the pressure system were examined, their condition and the examination results
• Any repairs, modifications or changes to safe operating limits needed to prevent danger or maintain effective protective devices
• The date by which those actions must be completed
• The date after which the system must not be operated without a further examination under the scheme
• Whether the WSE remains suitable or needs modification, with reasons if a change is needed

The report should be sent as soon as practicable and within the period required by the Regulations. The dutyholder then needs to complete any specified action by its deadline and arrange the next examination in time.

Do not treat the report as paperwork to file away. Its findings determine whether repairs, changes to operating limits or an updated WSE are necessary.

What Happens If Imminent Danger Is Found?

Regulation 10 sets out an additional process when the competent person concludes that the pressure system, or part of it, will give rise to imminent danger unless specified repairs, modifications or changes to operating conditions are made.

The competent person must issue a separate written report immediately to the relevant user or owner, identifying the system and required action. They must also send the required particulars to the enforcing authority within 14 days of completing the examination.

The affected system, or the affected part, must not be operated until the specified action has been completed. This is distinct from a defect for which the ordinary examination report sets a future completion date.

Is a PSSR Examination the Same as Servicing?

No. A PSSR examination checks specified safety-critical parts in accordance with the WSE. Routine servicing keeps the equipment maintained and operational between examinations.

HSE explicitly states that an examination under a WSE is not a substitute for regular and routine maintenance. Having a compressor serviced does not, on its own, establish that its PSSR examination is current.

Who Can Carry Out a PSSR Examination?

A PSSR examination must be carried out by a competent person with the knowledge, experience and independence appropriate to the pressure system and examination.

HSE notes that an in-house competent person should be independent of the organisation’s operating functions and have sufficient authority to stop use of the equipment if necessary. An external provider can also fulfil the role where suitably competent.

The competent person must be able to assess the system and WSE, apply appropriate examination methods, interpret findings and identify action needed to prevent danger.

How Often Is a PSSR Examination Required?

The maximum interval comes from the Written Scheme of Examination. There is no single annual examination rule that applies identically to every pressure vessel.

The interval and method depend on factors such as equipment design, age, operating conditions, relevant fluid, expected deterioration and previous findings. The competent person should review whether the WSE remains suitable as those factors change.

The examination report states the date after which the system must not continue operating without a further examination under the scheme. Use that date and the WSE to plan the next visit.

How Should You Prepare for a PSSR Examination?

Start with the WSE. It tells you what equipment must be available and whether any shutdown or specialist preparation is needed.

Useful information to have ready includes:

• The current WSE
• The previous examination report
• Equipment identification and manufacturer details
• Safe operating limits
• Records of significant repairs or modifications
• Relevant maintenance and service history
• Access to every item listed for examination

Confirm any isolation, depressurisation, cooling, draining or opening requirements in advance. If equipment has changed since the WSE was prepared, tell the competent person before the examination.

For a newly purchased compressor, see our guide to Written Schemes before first use.

Which Pressure Systems Might Need an Examination?

Qualifying systems can include air receivers and compressed air systems, steam boilers, autoclaves, process pressure vessels and associated protective devices or pipework.

Whether a particular item falls within PSSR depends on the system, relevant fluid, pressure and any applicable exception. Equipment should be assessed on its actual specification rather than its name or apparent size.

Book a PSSR Examination

PSSR Examination FAQs

What is checked during a PSSR examination?

The WSE sets the scope. Depending on the system, the examination can include pressure vessels, protective devices and specified pipework or pipelines whose failure could give rise to danger.

Is a PSSR inspection the same as a PSSR examination?

“PSSR inspection” is a common informal term. The Regulations use “examination” for the statutory process carried out by a competent person in accordance with the WSE.

Does every examination include an internal vessel inspection?

No. Internal examination is carried out where required by the WSE. The appropriate method depends on the vessel and the deterioration being assessed.

Does every examination include ultrasonic thickness testing?

No. Ultrasonic measurement or other NDT may be specified where appropriate, but it is not an automatic part of every PSSR examination.

Are safety valves examined?

Protective devices forming part of the pressure system must be addressed by the WSE. It specifies the nature of their examination and any testing required.

Must the system be shut down?

It depends on the work specified by the WSE. Internal examination or other checks may require isolation, depressurisation, draining, cooling or opening the vessel.

Is a PSSR examination the same as a compressor service?

No. The statutory examination follows the WSE; servicing follows the equipment’s maintenance programme. Both may be needed.

How often is a PSSR examination required?

The WSE specifies the maximum interval. The competent person’s report states the date after which the system must not operate without another examination under the scheme.

What happens if an examination identifies a defect?

The report identifies required repairs, modifications or changes to safe operating limits and the deadline for completing them. Imminent danger triggers separate immediate reporting and restrictions on operation.

Does new pressure equipment need a WSE?

Qualifying pressure equipment needs a suitable WSE before operation. Examination before first use is required where the scheme provides for it. New equipment is not automatically exempt.

Resources

• • HSE – Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000
  • HSE – Written Schemes of Examination
  • HSE – Safety of Pressure Systems: Approved Code of Practice L122
  • HSE – Introduction to Pressure Equipment
  • HSE – Inspection and Non-Destructive Testing
  • Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000

 

“Permanent doesn’t mean maintenance-free. A fixed ladder can stay in place for decades while its fixings, structure and access points deteriorate.”

A fixed ladder may provide access to a roof, silo, tank, building or piece of plant for many years. Because it rarely moves, it can also be easy to overlook.

Corrosion can develop beneath protective coatings. Brackets can loosen. Changes to the supporting structure can affect an installation that once appeared sound. The fact that a ladder is permanently attached does not guarantee that it remains safe to climb.

Employers and those controlling work at height need arrangements for checking, maintaining and, where required, formally inspecting fixed ladders. The right inspection frequency depends on the ladder, its environment, how it is used and how quickly its condition could deteriorate.

Learn more about Velocity Safety’s Fixed Ladder Inspection service.

Jump to:

How Often Should Fixed Ladders Be Inspected?

Think about fixed ladder checks in three parts:

1. A check before climbing

The user should look for obvious defects and unsafe conditions before using the access route. This is a practical check for their immediate safety, not a substitute for a detailed structural inspection.

2. Planned, recorded inspections

A competent person should inspect the fixed ladder and relevant access components at intervals appropriate to the risk. The inspection should be recorded, and any defects should be managed.

HSE’s guidance on inspecting work equipment says the need for inspection and its frequency should be determined through risk assessment. Manufacturer recommendations, the operating environment, industry advice and the equipment’s inspection history should all inform the decision.

3. Additional inspections when circumstances change

Do not wait for the next scheduled date if the ladder has been struck, modified or otherwise affected by an event that could jeopardise its safety. The condition should be assessed before normal use resumes.

Is an Annual Fixed Ladder Inspection a Legal Requirement?

There is no universal statutory rule saying every fixed ladder must be formally inspected once every 12 months.

The relevant duties arise from the work equipment and work at height safety framework. Under PUWER, inspection is required in circumstances including where equipment safety depends on installation conditions, where deterioration could create danger, and following exceptional circumstances capable of affecting safety.

The inspection interval should be suitable for the particular installation. An organisation may decide that an annual competent-person inspection is appropriate for a ladder with limited use and little evidence of deterioration. Another installation may need more frequent attention because of its environment, use or inspection history.

What matters is being able to explain why the chosen interval is suitable and to respond when the condition of the ladder shows that the arrangement needs changing.

When Might a Fixed Ladder Need More Frequent Inspection?

Consider a shorter interval where the ladder or its supporting structure is more likely to deteriorate, or where the consequences of failure are particularly serious. Examples include:

• Heavy use: frequent climbing can increase wear on rungs, connections, access gates and associated equipment.
• Weather exposure: rain, freeze-thaw conditions and temperature changes can affect coatings, fixings and surrounding materials.
• Coastal locations: salt exposure can accelerate corrosion.
• Chemicals or industrial contamination: the operating environment may degrade particular materials or finishes.
• Vibration: machinery or structural vibration may affect brackets, bolts and welded connections.
• Previous defects: repeated corrosion, movement or loose fixings indicate that the existing interval may be too long.

HSE notes that inspection intervals can be shortened when experience shows deterioration occurring quickly. They may also be reviewed where a reliable inspection history shows negligible deterioration.

What Should Be Checked Before Climbing a Fixed Ladder?

A user check should identify visible problems without requiring the person to climb an unsafe ladder to investigate them. Depending on what can be seen safely, look for:

• Missing, loose, bent or damaged rungs
• Distorted or significantly corroded side rails
• Cracked welds or visibly loose brackets and fixings
• Unexpected movement of the ladder
• Oil, grease, ice, mud or other slippery contamination
• Damaged cages, hoops, platforms or access gates
• Obstructions at the ladder or landing
• Visible damage to an associated fall protection system

This is not a detailed engineering assessment. If the ladder appears damaged or its safety is uncertain, report the concern and prevent use until a competent person has assessed it. The simple pre-use check does not replace a planned, recorded inspection.

What Does a Formal Fixed Ladder Inspection Include?

A detailed inspection should assess the parts that make the whole access route safe. Its precise scope depends on the design, location and applicable manufacturer instructions or standards.

Rungs and side rails

The inspector may look for cracking, corrosion, deformation, worn surfaces, missing rungs and loose connections. A rung or rail can appear sound from a distance while a closer examination reveals deterioration.

Brackets, anchors and fixings

These connect the ladder to the building, tank, silo or plant. Loose bolts, damaged brackets, defective welds or signs of movement may compromise the installation even if the ladder itself remains in good condition.

Supporting structure

The inspection should consider visible deterioration or changes to the wall, concrete, steelwork or other material supporting the ladder. Where the integrity of that structure is uncertain, further specialist assessment may be necessary.

Cages, hoops and platforms

Where fitted, check these components for missing parts, damage, corrosion, deformation and secure attachment. Platforms, rest points and landing areas must also remain safe to use.

Access and exit arrangements

Getting onto and off a fixed ladder can be a significant part of the risk. The inspection should consider handholds, clearances, gates, landings, obstructions and the transition to the level being accessed.

Associated fall protection

Some fixed ladders have vertical rails, cables or other personal fall protection equipment. These components have their own instructions and inspection requirements. A sound ladder structure does not, by itself, prove that the associated fall protection is safe.

What Standards Apply to Fixed Ladders?

The applicable technical standard depends on what the ladder is designed to access and how the installation is configured.

BS 4211:2005+A1:2008

BS 4211 is the British Standard specification for permanently fixed ladders within its scope. It provides a technical benchmark for the design and construction of many fixed access installations.

BS EN ISO 14122-4:2016

BS EN ISO 14122-4 addresses fixed ladders used as permanent means of access to machinery. It may be relevant where the main purpose of the access arrangement is reaching stationary machinery.

Neither standard creates a universal 12-month inspection law. British Standards provide technical requirements and guidance; the legal duties to manage work equipment and work at height risks come from the applicable regulations.

Not every ladder attached to a building falls within precisely the same standards framework. A competent person should identify the ladder’s purpose and assess it against the requirements relevant to that installation.

Does a Fixed Ladder Safety Cage Count as Fall Protection?

A cage or set of safety hoops should not automatically be treated as a complete fall-arrest system.

HSE’s safety alert on hooped ladders explains that there is no evidence that hoops alone provide complete fall-arrest capability. It also notes that hoops can interfere with some personal fall-arrest systems.

That does not mean every existing cage must be removed. The dutyholder should assess the actual fall risk, the ladder design and whether additional protection or another means of access is needed. Any fall-arrest equipment used with a caged ladder should be assessed for compatibility.

When Is an Additional Inspection Needed?

After installation

Where the safety of work equipment depends on its installation, HSE’s PUWER guidance calls for inspection after installation and before first use. This is particularly relevant to a fixed ladder because its safety depends on its attachment, supporting structure, clearances and landing arrangement.

After modification or suspected damage

Arrange an assessment following circumstances that may have affected safety, such as:

• A vehicle or item of plant striking the ladder
• Modification to the ladder, brackets or platform
• Work affecting the supporting wall or steelwork
• Significant corrosion or unexpected movement
• A fall or other serious incident involving the installation

Do not rely on a future inspection date when a current concern calls the ladder’s safety into question.

What Happens If a Fixed Ladder Fails Inspection?

If a defect means the ladder cannot be confirmed safe for use, access should be prevented until the problem is resolved. Depending on the finding, this may involve repairing or replacing components, checking anchors, investigating the supporting structure or replacing the ladder.

The inspection report should clearly identify the defect and required action. Once remedial work is complete, the ladder should be assessed as appropriate before it returns to service. Recording a defect is only useful if the corrective action is completed.

What Records Should Be Kept?

Formal inspections carried out under the applicable work equipment inspection arrangements should be recorded. HSE advises keeping the inspection result at least until the next inspection of that equipment.

A useful record will normally identify:

• The ladder’s asset reference and location
• The inspection date and inspector
• What was examined and any limitations on access
• The condition of the ladder and associated components
• Defects, their significance and required action
• Whether the ladder is suitable for continued use
• The next planned inspection date or recommended interval

Inspection tags can help users identify an asset and its status, but they do not replace the underlying report or a process for closing out defects.

Who Can Inspect a Fixed Ladder?

A user can carry out a straightforward check for visible defects before climbing. A detailed inspection requires someone competent to assess the particular installation and its likely failure points.

HSE explains that a work equipment inspector should have sufficient knowledge and experience to know what to look at, what to look for and what to do if a problem is found. The competence required depends on the complexity of the ladder and inspection.

The law does not automatically require every fixed ladder inspection to be outsourced. The important question is whether the person doing it has the competence and access needed to make a reliable assessment.

Are Fixed Ladders Covered by LOLER?

Normally, no. A conventional fixed access ladder is climbed by the user; it is not equipment that mechanically lifts or lowers them. Its inspection arrangements are normally considered under the work equipment and work at height framework rather than a LOLER thorough-examination schedule.

Associated equipment should still be assessed on its own terms. Do not assume that one inspection label covers every part of a complex access or fall protection system.

Book a Fixed Ladder Inspection

Fixed Ladder Inspection FAQs

How often should fixed ladders be inspected?

There is no universal interval for every fixed ladder. Users should check for obvious defects before climbing, while planned competent-person inspections should take place at recorded intervals set according to the installation’s risks and condition. Inspect sooner after damage or significant changes.

Is an annual fixed ladder inspection a legal requirement?

No blanket 12-month rule applies to every fixed ladder. Annual inspection may be a sensible choice for a particular installation, but the interval should be supported by risk assessment, manufacturer guidance, environment, use and inspection history.

Do fixed ladders need checking before every use?

Users should check for obvious defects and unsafe access conditions before climbing. Simple user checks do not normally need to be recorded, but any concern should be reported and the ladder should not be used where its safety is in doubt.

What does a fixed ladder inspection include?

Depending on the installation, it may include rungs, side rails, welds, brackets, anchors, supporting structure, corrosion, cages, platforms, gates, landings and associated fall protection.

What standard applies to permanently fixed ladders?

BS 4211:2005+A1:2008 applies to permanently fixed ladders within its scope. BS EN ISO 14122-4:2016 may be relevant where the ladder provides permanent access to machinery. The applicable standard depends on the installation.

Does a ladder cage provide fall arrest?

A cage may form part of an access arrangement, but HSE says there is no evidence that hoops alone provide complete fall-arrest capability. The fall risk and any additional protection should be assessed.

Who can carry out a formal fixed ladder inspection?

Someone with sufficient knowledge and experience to assess the installation, identify safety-related defects and determine what action is needed. The level of competence depends on the ladder and inspection scope.

What if a fixed ladder fails inspection?

Prevent its use where safe access cannot be confirmed. Complete the necessary investigation, repair or replacement, then assess it as appropriate before returning it to service.

How long should inspection records be kept?

HSE advises retaining a work equipment inspection record at least until the next inspection of that equipment. Keep records accessible and track any remedial actions through to completion.

Resources

• • HSE – Inspection of Work Equipment
  • HSE – PUWER
  • HSE – Working at Height
  • HSE – Hooped Ladders and Personal Fall-Arrest Systems
  • Work at Height Regulations 2005
  • BSI – BS 4211 Permanently Fixed Ladders

 

“An anchor point can sit unused for months – but if somebody falls, it may suddenly be the most important component in the entire fall protection system.”

Fall arrest anchor points, safety eyebolts and other fixed anchor systems should never be treated as “fit and forget” equipment.

They form a critical part of the personal fall protection system, providing the connection point that a worker may rely on to prevent or arrest a fall.

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 require work-at-height equipment to be appropriately inspected and maintained, while HSE guidance confirms that equipment exposed to conditions that can cause deterioration needs inspection at suitable intervals and following exceptional circumstances that could affect its safety.

For many conventional fall arrest anchors, an annual formal inspection is the familiar industry interval. Anchors used for rope access or for raising and lowering people have traditionally been subject to more frequent examination, often every six months.

However, those intervals should not simply be treated as a universal legal rule for every eyebolt or anchor point.

Learn more about our Fall Arrest Anchor Installation & Testing service.

Jump to:

How Often Should a Fall Arrest Anchor Point Be Inspected?

For many conventional fall arrest anchor installations, formal inspection every 12 months is the commonly recognised industry interval.

Older industry guidance based on the previous edition of BS 7883 specified periodic examination at intervals no greater than:

• 12 months for fall arrest anchor devices
• 6 months for rope access anchor devices
• 6 months where an anchor device is used for raising or lowering a person

However, the current standard is BS 7883:2019 – Personal fall protection equipment. Anchor systems. System design, installation and inspection. Code of practice.

The modern approach places greater emphasis on the documentation and inspection requirements for the individual anchor system, including its System Technical File and Examination Scheme for Inspection.

That means the best answer is not simply:

“Every eyebolt must be pull tested once a year.”

Instead, the inspection regime should reflect the actual anchor system, how it is used and the conditions in which it operates.

Is a 12-Month Anchor Inspection a Legal Requirement?

Not in the simple way this is sometimes presented online.

The Work at Height Regulations do not contain a blanket statement saying that every fall arrest eyebolt must be pull tested once every 12 months.

Instead, the Regulations require work-at-height equipment to be properly inspected and maintained.

HSE guidance also states that equipment exposed to conditions that could cause deterioration resulting in dangerous situations should be inspected:

• At suitable intervals
• Each time exceptional circumstances occur that could jeopardise its safety

The appropriate interval therefore needs to take account of factors such as:

• The type of anchor system
• Its intended use
• The manufacturer’s instructions
• The original installer documentation
• The Examination Scheme for Inspection
• Frequency and intensity of use
• Environmental exposure
• Previous inspection findings
• Any incidents affecting the installation

For many fall arrest anchors, these requirements result in an annual formal inspection regime.

But the legal duty is ultimately to have a suitable inspection and maintenance system, rather than simply putting every anchor on the same 12-month calendar regardless of its circumstances.

How Often Should Rope Access and Abseil Anchors Be Inspected?

Anchors used for rope access deserve particular attention because their use differs from a conventional single-user fall arrest point.

Longstanding industry guidance has applied a six-month maximum periodic examination interval to anchor devices used for rope access or for raising and lowering people.

The intended use of the anchor therefore matters.

An anchor designed and documented for fall arrest should not simply be assumed suitable for rope access, abseiling, work positioning or another application.

Permanent anchor systems should be clearly identified and supported by appropriate installation and operating information explaining:

• What the anchor is intended to be used for
• How many users it is designed for
• How it should be accessed
• What equipment it can be used with
• How and when it should be inspected

If the intended use or inspection requirement cannot be established, that uncertainty should be resolved before workers are allowed to rely on the anchor.

Do Anchor Points Need Checking Before Every Use?

Yes. Formal periodic inspection does not remove the need for basic pre-use checks.

Before connecting to an anchor, the user should make sure there is no obvious reason why the point should not be relied upon.

Depending on the installation, warning signs can include:

• Visible corrosion
• Cracking or damage around the supporting structure
• A loose anchor or eyebolt
• Deformation or impact damage
• Missing or damaged components
• Unreadable identification
• An expired inspection label
• A warning or “do not use” tag
• Evidence that the point has been involved in a fall
• Changes to the wall, roof, steelwork or other surrounding structure

A pre-use inspection is not a substitute for formal periodic examination by a competent person.

It is simply another layer of protection intended to prevent somebody attaching themselves to an obviously damaged or out-of-date installation.

When Should a Fall Arrest Anchor Be Inspected Earlier?

The next inspection date is not a licence to ignore an anchor until that date arrives.

If something happens that could have affected the anchor’s safety, it should be assessed earlier.

After the Anchor Has Arrested a Fall

An anchor that has been loaded during an actual fall should not automatically be returned to service because it still looks undamaged.

The anchor, fixings, surrounding structure and other affected elements may have experienced forces capable of causing damage that is not obvious from a basic visual check.

The system should therefore be taken out of normal use and assessed before anybody relies on it again.

After Impact or Suspected Damage

Building work, plant movement, accidental impact or other site activity can affect an anchor or the structure supporting it.

If damage is suspected, waiting for the next scheduled inspection is inappropriate.

Following Structural Alterations

Changes to a wall, roof, parapet, steel frame or other supporting structure can affect an anchor installation even when the anchor itself has not been directly altered.

In Corrosive or Harsh Environments

Coastal locations, chemical exposure, industrial contaminants, persistent moisture and other aggressive environments can increase the rate of deterioration.

The inspection interval may therefore need shortening where conditions justify more frequent checks.

After Long Periods Out of Use

An unused anchor is not automatically a safe anchor.

If an installation has been dormant for a significant period and its inspection status is unclear, its condition should be established before it is returned to use.

What Is the Difference Between an Eyebolt and an Anchor Point?

Anchor point is the broader term.

It describes a secure attachment point incorporated into a personal fall protection system.

A safety eyebolt is one particular form of anchor device and may consist of an eye connected to a structural fixing installed into a suitable wall, roof, steelwork or other substrate.

Modern fall protection systems can also include:

• Roof anchors
• Structural anchor devices
• Horizontal safety line anchors
• Overhead anchors
• Rail or track systems
• Davit and confined-space anchor systems

The inspection process therefore needs to reflect what has actually been installed rather than treating every fall protection anchor as an identical eyebolt.

Where davit systems are involved, see our Davit Arm Installation & Pull Testing service.

Are Fall Arrest Eyebolts the Same as Lifting Eyebolts?

No.

An anchor designed for personal fall protection should not automatically be used as a lifting point for machinery, materials or other loads.

BS 7883 relates to anchor systems used for personal fall protection and does not cover the lifting of equipment.

Lifting operations require equipment that has been specifically designed, selected and certified for that purpose.

The fact that a safety eyebolt is designed to withstand forces associated with personal fall protection does not automatically make it suitable for lifting a load.

Does Every Anchor Inspection Involve a Pull Test?

Not necessarily in exactly the same way.

“Eyebolt testing” and “anchor pull testing” are commonly used search terms, but a competent periodic examination is broader than simply attaching a hydraulic tester to every anchor and applying the same load.

The appropriate inspection and testing method depends on factors including:

• The type of anchor
• How it has been installed
• The supporting substrate
• The manufacturer’s requirements
• The original installation documentation
• The Examination Scheme for Inspection
• The age of the installation
• Previous inspection and testing information

Proof or load testing may be required as part of the inspection for some systems, but the correct procedure and test load should be determined from the applicable documentation rather than assumed.

This is why a competent inspection should begin by understanding the installation – not simply by reaching for a pull tester.

What Does a Fall Arrest Anchor Inspection Check?

A proper anchor inspection can include much more than confirming that the eyebolt itself looks intact.

Depending on the anchor system, the competent person may examine:

• Identification and markings – confirming the anchor can be correctly identified and its intended use established.
• Visible condition – checking for wear, corrosion, cracking, deformation or other deterioration.
• Anchor fixings – assessing accessible fixings and confirming there are no obvious signs of movement or failure.
• Thread engagement – where relevant to removable threaded anchor devices.
• Supporting substrate – looking for cracks, damage, deterioration or other conditions that may affect the installation.
• Positioning – checking whether the anchor remains appropriate for the way workers access and use it.
• Fall clearance – considering whether sufficient space remains for the intended fall protection arrangement.
• Environmental suitability – identifying corrosion or materials that may be inappropriate for the conditions.
• System documentation – checking installation information, technical files and previous inspection records where available.
• Required testing – carrying out appropriate proof or load testing where the system requires it.
• Labelling – confirming inspection information and any next-examination date are clear.

The key point is that the anchor and the structure supporting it work together as a system.

An apparently perfect stainless-steel eyebolt installed into a damaged or unsuitable substrate does not provide a safe fall arrest anchor.

What Happens If a Fall Arrest Anchor Fails Inspection?

If an anchor cannot be demonstrated as safe for continued use, it should not remain available for workers to attach to.

Reasons an anchor may be withdrawn from service can include:

• Significant corrosion
• Deformation or physical damage
• Movement during testing
• Failure of a required proof test
• Insufficient thread engagement
• Cracking or failure within the substrate
• An unsuitable supporting structure
• Unsafe positioning
• Inadequate fall clearance
• Missing or inadequate system documentation
• An installation that cannot be satisfactorily inspected

The defective point should be clearly identified or isolated to prevent further use.

Depending on the problem, corrective action may involve repair, replacement, further structural investigation, a new installation or redesign of the fall protection arrangement.

Where the wider personal fall protection equipment also requires examination, Velocity Safety provides Personal Fall Protection Equipment inspections.

What Records Should You Receive After Anchor Testing?

Formal anchor inspection should leave a clear audit trail.

The inspection report should allow the building owner, employer or responsible person to identify:

• Which anchors were inspected
• The location of each anchor
• The system or anchor type
• Its intended use where known
• The inspection or testing carried out
• The outcome
• Any defects found
• Whether the anchor remains suitable for continued use
• Any remedial action required
• Any limitations identified during the inspection
• The next inspection requirement

Records matter because an inspection certificate is more than paperwork.

It creates traceability showing what was assessed, what condition the installation was in and why it was considered suitable – or unsuitable – for continued use.

Who Can Inspect and Test Fall Arrest Anchor Points?

Formal periodic examination should be completed by a competent person.

Competence involves more than owning a pull tester or knowing how to operate it.

The examiner needs sufficient knowledge, training, experience and resources to:

• Identify the anchor system
• Understand how it is intended to be used
• Interpret installation and manufacturer information
• Understand the applicable inspection requirements
• Recognise significant defects
• Assess the anchor and accessible surrounding structure
• Use appropriate test equipment correctly
• Interpret testing results
• Determine whether the installation remains suitable for continued use
• Identify appropriate corrective action where defects are found

This is particularly important with fall arrest anchors because a competent person’s decision may ultimately determine whether another worker subsequently trusts that installation with their life.

Do Fall Arrest Anchor Points Come Under LOLER?

Not automatically.

The Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER) apply to lifting equipment and lifting operations.

A conventional fixed anchor used solely as part of a personal fall arrest system is not automatically the same thing as lifting equipment.

However, equipment used for lifting or lowering people may fall within additional LOLER requirements, including more frequent thorough examination requirements.

This is another reason why the intended use of an anchor must be properly established rather than assuming that every eyebolt falls under exactly the same inspection regime.

Book Fall Arrest Anchor Inspection & Testing

Frequently Asked Questions

Do fall arrest anchor points have to be tested every year?

Annual formal inspection is common for fall arrest anchor systems, and longstanding industry guidance has used a maximum 12-month interval for conventional fall arrest anchors. However, the correct frequency should follow the requirements for the specific installation, including its Examination Scheme for Inspection, manufacturer and installer instructions, environment and condition.

Do rope access and abseil anchors need testing every six months?

Six-monthly periodic examination has traditionally been used for anchor devices intended for rope access or for raising and lowering people. The requirements for the specific system should always be checked rather than assuming the interval solely from the appearance of the anchor.

Does an anchor need inspecting after a fall?

Yes. If an anchor has been loaded during a fall or another event has occurred that could affect its safety, it should be taken out of normal use and assessed by a competent person before somebody relies on it again.

Is an anchor inspection the same as a pull test?

No. Pull or proof testing may form part of an anchor examination where required, but a complete inspection can also consider markings, visible condition, fixings, substrate, positioning, documentation, fall clearance and other factors affecting the safety of the installation.

Can a fall arrest eyebolt be used for lifting?

Not simply because it is an eyebolt. Personal fall protection anchors and lifting points are designed for different purposes. Equipment used for lifting machinery, materials or other loads should be specifically designed and certified for lifting operations.

Who can test fall arrest eyebolts?

Formal periodic examination should be undertaken by a competent person with sufficient knowledge, training, experience and resources to understand the anchor system, identify significant defects, use appropriate test equipment and determine whether the installation remains suitable for continued use.

Should an eyebolt be checked before every use?

Yes. Users should carry out an appropriate pre-use check for obvious damage, deterioration, expired inspection status or other signs that the anchor should not be relied upon. This does not replace the formal periodic examination.

Does every fall arrest anchor need a 12-month pull test?

No. Annual inspection is common for fall arrest anchors, but the exact inspection and testing procedure should follow the requirements of the particular anchor system. A proof or pull test may be required for some installations, while other systems have different examination requirements.

Resources

• Work at Height Regulations 2005
• HSE – Working at Height
• HSE – Inspection of Work Equipment
• HSE – Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations (LOLER)
• BSI – BS 7883:2019 Personal Fall Protection Anchor Systems
• Velocity Safety – Fall Arrest Anchor Installation & Testing
• Velocity Safety – Personal Fall Protection Equipment Inspections

“The right face fit test is the one that is suitable for the facepiece and wearer – not simply the cheapest or most technical option.”

When tight-fitting respiratory protective equipment (RPE) is used at work, it needs to seal adequately against the individual wearer’s face. A mask that fits one person correctly may not fit another, even when it is the same type and size.

Tight-fitting respiratory protective equipment (RPE) can only protect the wearer properly if it forms an adequate seal against their face. Face fit testing establishes whether a particular make, model and size of tight-fitting facepiece provides an adequate fit for the individual who will wear it.

There are two basic types of face fit test: qualitative face fit testing (QLFT) and quantitative face fit testing (QNFT). Both are recognised methods, but they work differently and cannot necessarily be used with the same types of RPE.

Current HSE INDG479 guidance sets out which methods are appropriate for different tight-fitting facepieces and how the tests should be carried out.

If you’re completely new to the subject, start with our guide to what face fit testing is and when it is required.

Learn more about Velocity Safety’s qualitative and quantitative Face Fit Testing service.

Jump to:

Qualitative vs Quantitative Face Fit Testing at a Glance

The main difference is how the effectiveness of the face seal is assessed.

Qualitative testing relies on the wearer’s response to a challenge aerosol, while quantitative testing uses specialist equipment to measure the fit objectively.

The important point is that quantitative testing is not simply a more advanced replacement for qualitative testing. The method selected needs to be suitable for the particular RPE being assessed.

What Is Qualitative Face Fit Testing?

Qualitative face fit testing (QLFT) is based on whether the wearer can detect a test agent that has entered the mask through leakage around the face seal.

HSE describes qualitative testing as a pass/fail method using a bitter- or sweet-tasting aerosol. Common test agents include Bitrex and Saccharin.

Before testing the respirator itself, the tester establishes whether the wearer can actually detect the chosen test agent. This preliminary check is often referred to as the sensitivity test or taste threshold test.

If the wearer cannot detect the aerosol during this screening stage, that qualitative method cannot be used for them. A different fit-testing method should be selected instead.

During the actual fit test, the wearer puts on the selected facepiece and test hood before completing a prescribed series of exercises designed to challenge the face seal.

To achieve a pass, the wearer must not taste the test agent at any point during the test exercises.

Which Masks Can Be Qualitatively Face Fit Tested?

Qualitative testing can be used for tight-fitting RPE including:

• Disposable filtering facepieces such as FFP2 and FFP3 masks
• Reusable half-mask respirators
• Tight-fitting powered respirators using a half mask
• Certain breathing apparatus configurations using a half mask

However, qualitative testing is not suitable for full-face masks.

This is one of the most important differences between the two approaches. If a worker uses a full-face tight-fitting respirator, a suitable quantitative method is required.

What Is Quantitative Face Fit Testing?

Quantitative face fit testing (QNFT) objectively measures the quality of the seal using specialist equipment rather than relying on whether the wearer can taste a test substance.

The test generates a numerical result known as a fit factor.

Current HSE guidance identifies two quantitative fit-testing methods: ambient particle counting (APC) and controlled negative pressure (CNP).

These methods calculate fit differently, which means “quantitative face fit testing” should not automatically be treated as one single procedure.

Ambient Particle Counting

Ambient particle counting measures the concentration of particles outside the facepiece and compares it with the concentration detected inside the facepiece.

The ratio between these measurements is used to calculate the fit factor.

Put simply, the equipment measures how effectively the facepiece prevents the outside challenge aerosol from entering through the face seal.

This is the principle used by ambient particle-counting equipment such as the TSI PortaCount. The equipment must be correctly selected, maintained and operated in accordance with the relevant fit-testing method and manufacturer’s instructions.

Velocity Safety uses PortaCount particle-counting equipment for quantitative face fit testing.

Controlled Negative Pressure Testing

Controlled negative pressure testing takes a different approach.

During the measurement, negative pressure is created inside the facepiece and specialist equipment measures the air leaking into it. The measured leakage is then used to calculate the quantitative fit factor.

CNP is suitable for reusable half masks and full-face masks, but HSE’s current method-selection guidance does not list it as suitable for disposable filtering facepieces.

This is another reason why simply requesting “a quantitative face fit test” is not always enough – the quantitative method itself also needs to suit the RPE being tested.

What Is a Face Fit Test Fit Factor?

A fit factor is the numerical measure produced during quantitative face fit testing.

For ambient particle counting, it is calculated from the concentration of challenge aerosol outside the facepiece compared with the concentration measured inside it.

A fit factor should not be confused with an Assigned Protection Factor (APF).

The fit factor is a measurement produced during an individual’s quantitative face fit test. An APF describes the level of workplace respiratory protection that a class of RPE is expected to provide when it is correctly selected and used.

Current HSE minimum quantitative fit factors include:

*HSE notes that where a PortaCount is used for APF 4 (FFP1) and APF 10 (FFP2) disposable half masks, the appropriate N95 technology must be employed.

The required minimum fit factor should be achieved during the applicable quantitative test exercises.

It is also important not to become overconfident because a very high fit factor has been recorded. HSE warns that the protection achieved in real workplace conditions can be lower than that achieved during a controlled fit test.

Correct RPE selection, donning, use, maintenance and a pre-use seal check therefore remain important even after a successful fit test.

Is Quantitative Face Fit Testing Better Than Qualitative?

Not automatically.

Quantitative testing has clear advantages because it gives an objective numerical measurement rather than depending on whether the wearer reports tasting a challenge agent.

That can be particularly useful where:

• A full-face mask is being used
• An objective numerical fit factor is required
• The wearer cannot reliably detect the qualitative test agent
• Real-time quantitative feedback can help identify a suitable facepiece
• Company, customer or industry requirements specify quantitative testing

However, qualitative testing remains a recognised method for suitable disposable and reusable half masks when it is carried out correctly by a competent person.

Quantitative testing is not automatically the “better” test. Qualitative testing remains a recognised method for suitable disposable and reusable half masks when it is performed correctly by a competent tester.

The better question is: which method is appropriate for the facepiece, wearer and testing requirements?

If You Use Disposable FFP2 or FFP3 Masks

Qualitative taste testing can be suitable, as can an appropriate quantitative ambient particle-counting method.

The correct choice will depend on the RPE, wearer, testing programme and any relevant workplace or customer requirements.

If You Use Reusable Half Masks

Qualitative testing, ambient particle counting and controlled negative pressure methods can all be suitable.

If You Use Full-Face Masks

Use an appropriate quantitative face fit test.

Qualitative taste testing is not considered suitable for full-face masks under current HSE guidance.

If the Wearer Cannot Taste the Test Solution

A qualitative test should not simply continue on the assumption that no taste means a good seal.

The wearer’s sensitivity to the chosen test aerosol must first be established. If they cannot detect it during the screening test, the qualitative method cannot be used and another method should be selected.

For a fuller walkthrough of the testing process, see What Does a Face Fit Test Involve?

Do You Need to Be Clean-Shaven for Both Types of Face Fit Test?

Yes.

Switching from qualitative to quantitative testing does not overcome facial hair interfering with a tight-fitting face seal.

The testing equipment can measure leakage, but it cannot make a tight-fitting facepiece seal correctly over facial hair.

HSE advises that fit testing should not be carried out where hair growth such as stubble, a beard, moustache or sideburns lies between the wearer’s skin and the sealing surface of the facepiece.

The wearer should also remain clean-shaven in the face-seal area whenever that tight-fitting RPE is subsequently worn at work.

If facial hair cannot be removed, an alternative form of RPE that does not rely on a tight seal against the face may be required. Loose-fitting powered hoods and helmets are examples of respiratory protection that may be considered where an adequate tight-face fit cannot be achieved.

Is a Face Fit Test the Same as a Seal Check?

No.

A face fit test establishes whether a specific make, model and size of tight-fitting facepiece is capable of fitting an individual wearer adequately.

A pre-use wearer seal check is performed every time the wearer puts on their fit-tested facepiece before entering the hazardous area.

The seal check helps confirm that the mask has been donned correctly on that occasion, but it does not replace formal face fit testing.

What Happens If You Fail a Face Fit Test?

A failed fit test does not necessarily mean that the wearer cannot use tight-fitting RPE.

Face shapes vary considerably, so another:

• Size
• Model
• Make
• Style of facepiece

may provide a much better fit.

What should not happen is repeatedly testing the same unsuitable facepiece until it eventually produces a passing result.

HSE refers to this practice as force fitting and advises that if a facepiece still fails after two fit tests, an alternative facepiece should be tried.

If an adequate fit cannot be achieved using tight-fitting RPE, another form of respiratory protection that does not depend on a tight face seal may need to be selected.

Who Can Carry Out Qualitative or Quantitative Face Fit Testing?

Whichever testing method is selected, the fit test should be conducted by a competent person.

Competence involves more than knowing how to operate a hood, nebuliser or particle-counting machine. The tester needs sufficient knowledge and practical ability to correctly perform the selected method, identify problems and interpret the result.

The BSIF Fit2Fit accreditation scheme provides a recognised way for employers to assess face fit tester competence and was developed with input from HSE and industry stakeholders.

Participation in Fit2Fit itself is not compulsory, but HSE identifies the scheme as a means employers can use when assessing whether a fit tester is competent.

Velocity Safety’s testers are Fit2Fit accredited for both qualitative and quantitative face fit testing.

What Records Should You Receive After Face Fit Testing?

A face fit test should be properly recorded rather than simply resulting in somebody being told that they have passed.

Current HSE guidance states that the fit test report should identify information including:

• The person who was fit tested
• The make, model, material and size of facepiece
• The fit-testing method used
• The test exercises completed
• The pass level used
• The overall pass or fail result
• For quantitative testing, the measured fit factors
• The date of the test
• Details of the person who carried out the fit test

This creates traceable evidence of exactly which facepiece the individual successfully tested with.

If they later move to a different make, model, size, type or material of tight-fitting facepiece, another fit test may be required.

Reusable RPE also requires appropriate ongoing examination and maintenance. Learn more about our RPE Examination & Servicing service.

Book Qualitative or Quantitative Face Fit Testing

Frequently Asked Questions

Qualitative and quantitative testing are often discussed as though one simply replaces the other. In reality, the correct method depends on the RPE being worn and how the fit is being assessed. Here are the quick answers to some of the questions we hear most often.

What is the main difference between qualitative and quantitative face fit testing?

Qualitative testing gives a subjective pass or fail based on whether the wearer detects a bitter or sweet test aerosol. Quantitative testing objectively measures the fit and produces a numerical result called a fit factor.

Can an FFP3 mask be qualitatively face fit tested?

Yes. HSE lists qualitative taste testing as a suitable method for disposable half-mask respirators, including FFP3 filtering facepieces. An appropriate quantitative ambient particle-counting test can also be used.

Can a full-face respirator have a qualitative face fit test?

No. Qualitative taste testing is not suitable for full-face masks. An appropriate quantitative method such as ambient particle counting or controlled negative pressure should be used.

Does quantitative face fit testing always use a PortaCount?

No. PortaCount systems use an ambient particle-counting method and are widely used for quantitative testing, but controlled negative pressure is another recognised quantitative method. Velocity Safety uses PortaCount particle-counting equipment for its quantitative face fit testing.

What fit factor do you need to pass a quantitative face fit test?

Under current HSE guidance, the required minimum quantitative fit factor is 100 for disposable FFP1, FFP2 and FFP3 masks tested using an appropriate ambient particle-counting method, 100 for reusable half masks and 2,000 for full-face masks. The testing method and equipment requirements must also be appropriate for the RPE being assessed.

Do you need to be clean-shaven for quantitative testing?

Yes. The clean-shaven requirement applies because tight-fitting RPE must seal directly against the wearer’s skin. Changing from qualitative to quantitative testing does not make a beard or stubble crossing the face seal acceptable.

What happens if I change to a different mask after passing?

A successful fit test relates to the facepiece that was tested. HSE advises repeating fit testing where there is a change to the RPE type, size, model or material, or where changes to the wearer could affect the fit.

Which is better: qualitative or quantitative face fit testing?

Neither method is automatically better in every situation. Qualitative testing is an accepted method for suitable disposable and reusable half masks, while quantitative testing provides an objective numerical result and is required for full-face masks. The correct method is the one appropriate for the RPE and wearer being tested.

Resources

• HSE INDG479 (rev2) – Guidance on Respiratory Protective Equipment Fit Testing
• HSE – Fit Testing Basics
• BSIF Fit2Fit – RPE Fit Test Providers Accreditation Scheme
• Velocity Safety – Face Fit Testing
• What Is Face Fit Testing?
• What Does a Face Fit Test Involve?

“A PTV of 36 or more is generally the benchmark people look for — but it still needs context.”

If you have had a pendulum slip test completed, one of the first things you may look for in the report is the Pendulum Test Value, often shortened to PTV.

In many cases, people want to know one thing: does the floor score 36 or more?

A PTV of 36 or above is commonly used as an indicator of low slip potential, particularly when assessing wet floor conditions. However, the result should still be understood in context, including the surface, contamination, footwear, cleaning regime and how the floor is actually used.

Jump to:

What Is PTV in Slip Testing?

PTV stands for Pendulum Test Value. It is the numerical result produced during a pendulum slip test.

The test uses a pendulum slip tester to simulate the action of a heel striking a floor surface. The higher the PTV, the greater the measured slip resistance of the surface under the test conditions.

PTV results are commonly used to assess the slip potential of flooring in workplaces, public areas, commercial buildings, warehouses, leisure facilities and other environments where slips, trips and falls may be a risk.

Read our full guide: What Is Pendulum Slip Testing?

Why Is a PTV of 36 Important?

A PTV of 36 or more is widely used as a benchmark for low slip potential, particularly when assessing wet floor conditions.

This matters because many slip incidents happen when flooring becomes wet, contaminated or poorly maintained. A floor may feel acceptable when dry, but become much more slippery once water, oil, dust or other contamination is introduced.

If a floor can achieve a PTV of 36 or more in the relevant conditions, it can provide useful evidence that the surface has been assessed and has a lower measured slip potential.

That does not mean the number should be viewed in isolation. The test result should be considered alongside the workplace, the likely contaminants, the cleaning process, the footwear worn and the actual way people move across the floor.

What Happens If a Floor Scores Below PTV 36?

A PTV below 36 may indicate a higher slip potential, especially if the result relates to wet or contaminated testing.

It does not automatically mean the floor is unlawful or must be replaced immediately, but it should trigger a review of the wider slip risk.

Depending on the site, this may involve looking at:

• Cleaning methods and cleaning frequency
• Likely contamination, such as water, oil, dust or food residue
• Drainage and entrance matting
• Footwear requirements
• Changes in floor gradient or surface finish
• Whether a different floor surface is needed

In some cases, further testing may be needed after cleaning changes, remedial work or surface treatment.

Does a PTV of 36 Guarantee Nobody Will Slip?

No. A PTV of 36 or more is a useful benchmark, but it does not guarantee that nobody will ever slip.

Slip risk is affected by more than the floor surface alone. Even a floor with a good PTV result can become hazardous if it is poorly cleaned, contaminated, worn, damaged or used with unsuitable footwear.

For example, a surface may test well when clean and wet, but perform differently if exposed to oil, fine dust, grease, food residue or heavy wear.

Can a PTV of 36 Help Defend Slip Claims?

It can help, provided the testing is relevant, recorded and forms part of a wider slip risk management approach.

If you can show that your flooring achieved a PTV of 36 or more under appropriate test conditions, it may provide useful evidence that the surface was assessed and had low measured slip potential at the time of testing.

This can be valuable if you need to respond to slip complaints, insurance queries or claims. However, the test result is only one part of the evidence picture. Cleaning records, inspection logs, maintenance actions and incident records may also matter.

Velocity Safety provides independent pendulum slip testing to help businesses understand floor slip resistance and support risk assessment decisions.

How Often Should PTV Be Checked?

There is no single fixed interval that applies to every floor. The right frequency depends on the environment, the level of traffic, the type of contamination, previous incidents and how quickly the floor surface may wear.

Floors in high-traffic or wet areas may need more regular review than low-risk areas with little contamination.

Testing may also be sensible:

• Before installing new flooring
• After a slip incident or complaint
• After surface treatment or remedial work
• When changing cleaning chemicals or cleaning methods
• When a floor surface begins to look worn or polished

See why flooring samples should be slip tested before installation.

Final Takeaway

A PTV of 36 or more is generally the benchmark used to indicate low slip potential, especially in wet floor conditions.

However, the result should always be understood in context. A good PTV result supports your slip risk assessment, but it does not replace good housekeeping, cleaning, maintenance and sensible control measures.

If you are unsure what your floor’s PTV result means, get it reviewed by someone competent in pendulum slip testing and slip risk assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Here are some of the questions we are commonly asked about PTV results, slip testing and what a value of 36 means in practice.

What does PTV stand for?

PTV stands for Pendulum Test Value. It is the result produced during a pendulum slip test and is used to assess floor slip resistance.

Is PTV 36 good?

Yes, a PTV of 36 or more is generally considered to indicate low slip potential, especially when assessing wet floor conditions.

What does a PTV below 36 mean?

A PTV below 36 may indicate increased slip potential. It does not automatically mean a floor is unlawful, but the result should be reviewed as part of a wider slip risk assessment.

Does PTV 36 mean a floor is completely safe?

No. A PTV of 36 is a useful benchmark, but slip risk also depends on contamination, cleaning, footwear, maintenance and how the floor is used.

Can PTV results help defend slip claims?

PTV results can provide useful evidence that a floor has been tested and assessed. They are most useful when supported by cleaning records, maintenance logs and a suitable slip risk assessment.

Resources

• HSE – Slips and Trips
• HSE – Assessing the Slip Resistance of Flooring

“New doesn’t always mean compliant.”

A client recently supplied us with a brand new item of lifting equipment purchased online for examination before use.

Although the equipment had never been used, our examination quickly identified several issues that raised immediate concerns over whether it was suitable for lifting operations.

This is a good reminder that buying brand new equipment does not automatically mean it is compliant or safe to put into service.

The Problem

The client had recently purchased lifting equipment online believing that, because it was brand new, it would be ready to use following examination.

However, once presented for examination, several issues immediately became apparent.

• No visible CE or UKCA marking.
• No evidence of compliance with EN13157.
• Questionable Safe Working Load information.

Why This Matters

Many buyers understandably assume that if equipment arrives boxed, unused and supplied with paperwork it must be compliant.

Unfortunately, this is not always the case.

A competent examiner should assess more than whether the equipment looks new. Markings, standards, traceability and overall suitability all form part of the examination process.

Learn more about our Thorough Examination of Lifting Accessories service.

Outcome

Because the issues were identified before the equipment entered service, the client avoided introducing potentially unsuitable lifting equipment into the workplace.

Although disappointing, identifying these issues early is exactly what a competent examination is designed to achieve.

Final Takeaway

This case highlights why new equipment should never be assumed to be compliant simply because it has never been used.

Independent examination helps ensure lifting equipment meets the necessary standards before anyone relies upon it during lifting operations.

“Brand new doesn’t automatically mean compliant.”

Many businesses assume that if lifting equipment arrives brand new in the box, it must be safe to use.

Unfortunately, that isn’t always the case.

We’ve seen supposedly new lifting equipment fail inspection before it has ever been put into service because it was missing essential compliance information, manufactured to the wrong standard or simply couldn’t demonstrate it was suitable for lifting operations.

Jump to:

Real Example: Brand New Equipment That Failed Inspection

We recently examined a brand new item of lifting equipment that had been purchased online.

Although unused, several concerns were immediately identified before it could be considered suitable for service.

• No CE or UKCA marking.
• No evidence of compliance with EN 13157.
• Questionable Safe Working Load (SWL) information.

Although the equipment was brand new, that alone was not enough to demonstrate compliance.

Why Can New Lifting Equipment Fail?

New equipment is not automatically compliant.

Problems can include:

• Missing CE or UKCA marking.
• No evidence of compliance with the relevant product standard.
• Missing or unclear Safe Working Load markings.
• Poor traceability.
• Missing declarations or manufacturer information.

These issues should be identified before equipment enters service.

What Should Be Present?

Before lifting equipment is put into use, it should typically include:

• Manufacturer identification.
• Clear Safe Working Load marking.
• Relevant CE or UKCA marking.
• Compliance with the appropriate standard where applicable.
• Product traceability.
• Supporting documentation.

Learn more about our Thorough Examination of Lifting Accessories service.

A Thorough Examination Is More Than Paperwork

A competent examiner should do far more than simply check whether paperwork has been provided.

The examination should consider whether the equipment appears suitable, correctly marked, appropriately identified and safe to enter service.

Paperwork alone should never override obvious compliance concerns.

Final Takeaway

Buying lifting equipment online can be perfectly acceptable—but only if the equipment can demonstrate that it meets the necessary compliance requirements.

Before putting any lifting equipment into service, ensure it has been properly examined by a competent person and don’t assume that “brand new” automatically means “safe to use”.

Frequently Asked Questions

Here are some of the questions we’re commonly asked about new lifting equipment and Thorough Examinations.

Can brand new lifting equipment fail inspection?

Yes. New equipment can fail if it lacks the correct markings, documentation or evidence of compliance with the relevant standards.

Does new lifting equipment still need checking?

Yes. New equipment should always be checked before entering service to confirm it is suitable, correctly marked and compliant.

What does a competent examiner look for?

A competent examiner considers the equipment itself, its markings, traceability, documentation and overall suitability—not just whether paperwork has been supplied.

Resources

• LOLER 1998
• PUWER Guidance